Re: [selectors] Need to clearly define matching for :first-child, :nth-*, etc from Daniel Glazman on 2015-07-15 (www-style@w3.org from July 2015)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:19:08 +0200
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <55A6B22C.802@disruptive-innovations.com>

On 15/07/2015 21:09, Daniel Glazman wrote:

> :first-child() is explicitely defined in Selectors 3 section
> 6.6.5.6 as the "same as :nth-child(1) so it should match on an element
> without a parent either.

Wow, I'm tired. Please of course read "it should not match on".

</Daniel>

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 19:19:33 UTC