- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:02:40 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 7/15/15 2:57 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > I think we had that discussion when I originally added :nth-child() to > a draft of Selectors 3 eons ago. The consensus was that the functional > pseudo-class does not match if there is no parent IIRC. Yes. That consensus got reversed at some point, as I understand, and the intent of level 4 is that they should match in this case, by assuming the element is the only child of its (nonexistent) parent... Now I'll go back to trying to implement these specs and let you guys keep flipflopping. ;) -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 19:03:09 UTC