- From: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:45:51 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
O Xov, 07-05-2015 ás 17:18 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. escribiu: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Sergio Villar Senin < > svillar@igalia.com> wrote: > > On 12/01/15 21:43, fantasai wrote: > > > The Grid spec, for 'auto' sized columns, uses the min-content > > > size of > > > the items > > > to find the base size of the track. After some discussion, Tab, > > > Rossen, > > > Greg and > > > I think it makes more sense to use the specified minimum size > > > (via > > > 'min-width' > > > and 'min-height'). To get sensible behavior by default, we'll > > > honor > > > 'min-size: auto' > > > as 'min-size: min-content' just like in Flexbox. > > > > I've started to implement this for Blink and WebKit and I have > > found > > some issues that I'd like to expose here: > > > > 1) It's about setting the initial value of min-size as 'auto' for > > grid > > items. IMHO referring to the behavior in flexbox is a bit > > suboptimal. I > > know that the spec editors are the same and that the development of > > both > > layout systems is a bit entangled but for a guy with a reasonably > > good > > knowledge of the grid specs like me, reading the description of > > 'auto' > > in flexbox[1] is kind of alien language (full of flexbox jargon). > > We've copied the Flexbox definition over and translated it into Grid > terms. Let us know if there are any lingering problems, or something > doesn't make sense. Actually I think there was a copy&paste error :) as I miss a sentence which is present in the flexbox spec just after talking about "content size" which is the following: "Otherwise, this keyword computes to 0 (unless otherwise defined by a future specification)." Perhaps we don't need the text in parentheses as that applies to anything right? :P BR
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 08:46:39 UTC