W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2015

RE: [css-round-display] Request for first review the css-round-display

From: Soonbo Han <soonbo.han@lge.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:50:03 +0900
To: "'Florian Rivoal'" <florian@rivoal.net>, "'Hyojin Song'" <hyojin22.song@lge.com>
Cc: "'www-style'" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005401d0b7af$9d92fc80$d8b8f580$@lge.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Rivoal [mailto:florian@rivoal.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 6:18 AM
> To: Hyojin Song
> Cc: www-style
> Subject: Re: [css-round-display] Request for first review the css-round-
> display
> 14) I am not sure I understand how "border-boundary: parent" works. Is it
> to be used to fit the border inside the parent element's shape inside? If
> yes, I think you need to explain this better, and explicitly mention
> shape-inside (and probably shape-padding as well). If it means something
> else, could you explain what? I think using the parent's shape-inside is
> useful, so if that's not what your value does, then we should add one more
> value for that.

"border-boundary: parent" is intended that the border of an element is
circumscribed within that of its parent (possibly a round shape). [1] This
is similar to "border-boundary: display", but the border of the element is
bounded by that of its parent not by that of the display.

If it uses the parent's shape-inside, it actually does nothing because the
element is already laid inside its parent as in [2]. So I think that
referring to the border of the element's parent is more plausible.

These are the initial thoughts, but if something is unclear or unsound,
please let me know.


[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-round-display/images/border_c.png
[2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes-2/images/shape-inside-content.png
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 05:50:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:18 UTC