W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2015

RE: [css-round-display] Request for first review the css-round-display

From: Soonbo Han <soonbo.han@lge.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:50:03 +0900
To: "'Florian Rivoal'" <florian@rivoal.net>, "'Hyojin Song'" <hyojin22.song@lge.com>
Cc: "'www-style'" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005401d0b7af$9d92fc80$d8b8f580$@lge.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Rivoal [mailto:florian@rivoal.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 6:18 AM
> To: Hyojin Song
> Cc: www-style
> Subject: Re: [css-round-display] Request for first review the css-round-
> display
> 
> 14) I am not sure I understand how "border-boundary: parent" works. Is it
> to be used to fit the border inside the parent element's shape inside? If
> yes, I think you need to explain this better, and explicitly mention
> shape-inside (and probably shape-padding as well). If it means something
> else, could you explain what? I think using the parent's shape-inside is
> useful, so if that's not what your value does, then we should add one more
> value for that.
> 

"border-boundary: parent" is intended that the border of an element is
circumscribed within that of its parent (possibly a round shape). [1] This
is similar to "border-boundary: display", but the border of the element is
bounded by that of its parent not by that of the display.

If it uses the parent's shape-inside, it actually does nothing because the
element is already laid inside its parent as in [2]. So I think that
referring to the border of the element's parent is more plausible.

These are the initial thoughts, but if something is unclear or unsound,
please let me know.

Thanks,
Soonbo

[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-round-display/images/border_c.png
[2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes-2/images/shape-inside-content.png
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 05:50:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:18 UTC