- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:04:35 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALYZoVOP_4P+X0DDhgg4stE6HudiEugqZ+C7zKA2EB51d7r=-w@mail.gmail.com>
Koji Ishii wrote: > I'd like to propose: > > writing-mode: sideways-left > > which is equivalent to setting the two properties: > writing-mode: vertical-lr; > text-orientation: sideways-left; fantasai wrote: > Thinking about this some more, though, I think what we can do > is move *both* orientations into the writing-mode, like this: > > writing-mode: horizontal-tb | vertical-rl | vertical-lr | sideways-rl | sideways-lr; > text-orientation: mixed | upright | sideways (or sideways-rl) Both of these proposals seem like extremely poor property design to me. Putting text-orientation values into the 'writing-mode' property will be totally confusing for authors, both those working with vertical captions in non-CJK text and for those working with non-CJK vertical scripts. I think we should keep the 'writing-mode' and 'text-orientation' properties simple and orthogonal and not try and turn 'writing-mode' into some form of pseudo-shorthand. Implementations will eventually implement 'sideways-left' for vertical caption use. Just because they haven't done so yet is not really a good justification for moving 'sideways-left' into 'writing-mode'. Regards, John Daggett Mozilla Japan
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 01:05:04 UTC