- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:15:55 -0800
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:03:24 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Similarly for 'opacity' (although that is represented with higher >>>>> precision >>>>> I think). >>>> >>>> >>>> I would be totally fine with specifying that opacity must be >>>> serialized with 2 or 3 digits. >>> >>> >>> OK. Presto serializes at most 2 digits. Are people OK with that? Or is >>> the >>> Gecko/IE approach better? >> >> >> I'd prefer rgba() alpha and 'opacity' to serialize the same way. They >> both use <alphavalue>, after all. > > > Yes, but they're stored differently in at least some implementations. If we > say that 'opacity' can only be serialized up to three digits, it will not be > equivalent to rgba() since 'opacity' will be able to serialize 1001 > different values but rgba() only 256. > > We could limit to 6 digits like IE/Gecko but say that values less than > 0.0000005 must serialize as 0, which avoids serializing sci-not (and > limiting digits there), and so masks all(?) float->double rounding errors. > > Possibly the spec could have different strategies depending on how it's > stored, and not tie it to rgba() vs. opacity. I don't think the difference between representing 256 and 1001 values is significant. I'm fine with the algorithm popping out slightly different results. Or else we can specify that <alphavalue> is converted to a byte for the purpose of serializing, if we really want to be identical. Letting opacity go to 6 digits just because it's capable of accurately representing that many doesn't seem very useful. That much precision is never useful in the first place; you can only barely tell the difference between .01 increments, let alone .001 increments. But this also isn't very important, and so matching IE/Gecko is fine. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 30 January 2015 19:16:42 UTC