- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:00:58 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Randy Edmunds <redmunds@adobe.com>
I am concerned that this is getting to the level of detail where we might end up (possibly implicitly) requiring the use of a specific algorithm. I don't think that would be appropriate here. On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >>> On 26 Jan 2015, at 23:55, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >>> [...] >>> the deviation from the average >>> [...] >> >> Is this intentionally left vague, opening differences in terms of quality of implementation? > > That's not vague. Deviation is a numerical value that you can compare > across lines. It's just linear difference. > >> I would clarify 'deviation' into 'standard deviation'. Compared to the mean absolute deviation, the std dev is preferable, as it punishes extreme values more. For example, on a four line block, if you have between each line being 1 character off the average, or 2 lines being exactly at the average and 2 lines being off by 2 characters, the standard deviation would prefer the first situation, while the mean absolute deviation would be indifferent. > > I agree that minimizing the squared deviation is better. It's almost > always better for these kinds of "get close to the average" things. > > ~TJ >
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 19:01:20 UTC