- From: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:42:00 +0000
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shashi Gowda <shashigowda91@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Shashi Gowda <shashigowda91@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have this markup: > > > > <div style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: row;"> > > <div style="width: 100px; flex: 1 1 0; height: 100px; background-color: > > gray;"></div> > > <div style="width: 150px; flex: 1 1 0; height: 150px; background-color: > > black;"></div> > > </div> > > > > The two inner boxes appear one after the other, their width are distributed > > and they sum up to the sum of their original width. They overflow if the > > container's width is not sufficient. (Also notice that the flex-basis of the > > boxes is 0.) > > That's not right. The spec algo should shrink them to 0. If they > have a definite flex-basis, their widths are *totally ignored*, which, > for inline layout, should shrink the whole thing to 0. Looks like a > bug in Chrome. Does it also show this behavior in Firefox and IE? > (I'm on a Chromebook right now, so can't easily test.) > > ~TJ >IE has the right behavior here. Just for review and creating bugs on FF/Chrome: Testcase: http://jsfiddle.net/o9r2mmgh/show/ Screenshot: http://imgur.com/ZiYyEE1 Greg
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 19:42:28 UTC