Re: Where is the "complete document"

> On 22 Jan 2015, at 23:22, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Sam Pinkus <sgpinkus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 01/23/2015 06:36 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>> Woah, *that's* an old document.  It'll celebrate its 14th birthday
>> 
>> Yet still one of the top results on popular search engines for "css3
>> specification".
> 
> Holy crap you're right, it's the 4th result for me.  Let's... get that
> slapped with an obsoletion notice.
> 
> Peter, Daniel, who can I talk to about maintaining that document?  It
> desperately needs a notice that it's an old and out-of-date document
> that should only be referenced as a historical artifact.

Given how we've handled obsolete documents with no chance of progress recently, this should be retired from the REC track entirely, and turned into a note. Probably a gutted one.

 - Florian

Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 10:06:52 UTC