- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:47:14 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 10/24/2014 08:05 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > On 08/19/2014 04:36 PM, fantasai wrote: >> Okay, we've fixed this in the spec. Note this will affect auto-sizing >> of floats and other shrinkwrapped things. >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/#intrinsic-sizes > > One nit on this new intrinsic-sizing spec text: > > QUOTE: > # 1. For each flex item, subtract its flex basis > # from its max-content contribution size [...] > ...and: > # 3. [...] Add each item’s flex basis to the product of its [...] > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/#intrinsic-sizes > > "flex basis" is not the right term to use here, if we're doing addition > & subtraction. Consider e.g. "flex-basis: 50%" -- that's not usable for > arithmetic until we've established the flex container's size. (And we > might be in the process of establishing the container's size, if we have > e.g. a floated auto-sized flex container.) > > I think this means to say "flex base size" perhaps? That term is defined > here: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#flex-base-size Fixed. Thanks. :) ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 01:47:48 UTC