W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [css-ruby] collapse ruby-position values

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:54:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbUnYBBNJhXJpf4u_m8rOergBUqgj3q59Ouj=XANBb8p8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm also good to allow just "over" and "under", and it looks like
>> fantasai was good as well 4 months ago. Let's see if she'd jump in,
>> and I'll make edits if not.
> I still think it is better to directly collapse to only three values: start,
> end, and inter-character, instead of the pairs, unless you have strong use
> cases to show it is necessary.

I meant I'm good with only three values, but "over", "under", and
"inter-character". Why do you think "start" and "end" works better
than "over" and "under" here?

Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 00:54:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:50 UTC