- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:54:08 +0900
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm also good to allow just "over" and "under", and it looks like >> fantasai was good as well 4 months ago. Let's see if she'd jump in, >> and I'll make edits if not. > > > I still think it is better to directly collapse to only three values: start, > end, and inter-character, instead of the pairs, unless you have strong use > cases to show it is necessary. I meant I'm good with only three values, but "over", "under", and "inter-character". Why do you think "start" and "end" works better than "over" and "under" here? /koji
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 00:54:35 UTC