- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:44:58 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Julien Chaffraix <jchaffraix@google.com>, www-style@w3c.org
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 16:45:45 UTC
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Julien Chaffraix < > jchaffraix@google.com> > >> wrote: > >> > It was pointed out to me that 'left' / 'right' [1] in the Box > >> > Alignment specification are not the physical directions but refer to > >> > the line-relative ones, resp. line-left / line-right. AFAICT these are > >> > new values in CSS Box Alignment, thus they could use the line-relative > >> > values from writing-mode [2] to prevent this confusion. Did I miss > >> > anything? > >> > >> Is there a good reason to use "line-left/right" over "left/right"? We > >> use left/right to refer to line-relative directions all over the > >> place, such as in text-align; we only differentiate the terms in specs > >> when necessary. > > > > which in our opinion is an exceedingly broken usage > > Who is "our"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosism > And why? > i can see it being reasonable to say that "in the context of text alignment, left (right) is interpreted as start (end) in vertical writing modes" but i don't believe it reasonable to say that "left means right" in a bidi horizontal writing mode > > ~TJ >
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 16:45:45 UTC