- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:56:49 +0900
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 10:57:16 UTC
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Clarified that it's UA dependent in Level 1[1]. How UAs render >> Bopomofo and how much UAs do so interoperably is very unclear to me, >> so I think this is the best for me as of this point. Please let me >> know if any. >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ruby/#ruby-size > > > I guess you probably should use "font size" instead of simply "size" here, > because size may refer to the box size. > Done, can you review again? > In addition, the spec says: > > > This level of the specification does not provide a mechanism to control > the size of ruby annotations. > > I think we do have mechanism for authors to control the font size of ruby > annotations, which is the font-size property. > Right, added "relative to ruby base." Does this resolve the concern? It might probably be better to mention that the default style sheet is not > normative, and say that UAs are free to behave a different way for some of > the styles. > It's already there; Appendix A says it's informative. /koji
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 10:57:16 UTC