On 08/01/15 22:42, Peter Salas wrote: > fantasai wrote: >> I suspect that peculiarity was inherited from the old algorithm writeup... > > Yup, looks like an oversight. Yeah, it was considered in the old algo but just in the initialization phase AFAIK. >> Anyway, I've checked in a fix for this. Here's the diff: >> http://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/1854a2a92502/css-grid/Overview.bs >> >> Let me know if that adequately solves the problem, or if there's a better way >> to word it. > > Looks fine to me. Looks good to me too. BRReceived on Friday, 9 January 2015 08:19:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:50 UTC