- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:12:49 -0800
- To: Peter Salas <psalas@microsoft.com>, Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/05/2015 11:37 AM, Peter Salas wrote: > Sergio Villar Senin wrote: >> the grid layout specs mention[1] that >> >> "(The base size might end up being larger than the growth limit, but the >> algorithm attempts to avoid this situation.)" >> >> the thing is that IMO we should change it so that the the track sizes fulfill, at >> any moment, the following restriction. >> >> base size <= growth limit > > I agree. This is also the behavior in IE, as can be seen here: > > http://jsfiddle.net/krkhhttz/ I suspect that peculiarity was inherited from the old algorithm writeup... Anyway, I've checked in a fix for this. Here's the diff: http://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/1854a2a92502/css-grid/Overview.bs Let me know if that adequately solves the problem, or if there's a better way to word it. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 21:15:10 UTC