- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 16:15:19 -0700
- To: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+fhZJbpuXfdmRoOgc_NMBxH_6MN7mPBwBu620Vcj1oS-w@mail.gmail.com>
not really; orphans are more often associated with lines, not "words", and are related to widows; an orphan is a line (or small number of lines) at the end of the column/page which lines continue to next column/page, while a widow is a line (or small number of lines) at the beginning of the column/page which lines continue from the previous column/page; using the term "orphan" for "words" is not as common, and refers to words in a short last line of a paragraph (not at the end of a line), that might have been prevented if tighter tracking/setting had been used; i would tend to call this a "short last line" rather than an orphan; On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote: > In typography, orphans are lone words at the end of a line. However, in > CSS, the orphans property controls the minimum number of lines in a block > container that must be left at the bottom of a page, not the minimum number > of words at the end of a line. Is there anything planned for typographic > orphans? If not, why? > > This must have been discussed before, but can't seem to find it, sorry. > Also, happy new year to everybody! > > ~Lea >
Received on Saturday, 3 January 2015 23:16:09 UTC