Re: [cssom-view] Which APIs should be 'double' vs. 'long' from Robert O'Callahan on 2015-12-22 (www-style@w3.org from December 2015)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:03:40 +1300
To: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Trav Stone <travtrilogi@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Emil A Eklund <eae@chromium.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbWTCJ9=OapULp9t5ax6EZY1qvvf-yLv+h4XBCWGUeneg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org> wrote:

> I agree this sounds better, thanks!
>
> So how would we characterize this?  Just a new CSSBoxType for "scrolling
> area" as defined by http://www.w3.org/TR/cssom-view/#scrolling-area?
>

Sure. Just call it "scrollingArea"?

Rob
-- 
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr  rdn rdsme,anea lurpr  edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor  stor  edna  siewaoeodm  or v sstvr  esBa  kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa  kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr  rdm  or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t  nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr
esn

Received on Tuesday, 22 December 2015 20:04:09 UTC