- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:44:48 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 15 December 2015 at 00:26, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Sebastian Zartner > <sebastianzartner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 9 December 2015 at 19:36, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Sebastian Zartner >>> <sebastianzartner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > To me the difference between the 'both' and 'point' values is not >>> > clear yet, or more precisely the difference between two 1D snap >>> > positions vs. one 2D snap position. >>> > So assuming those values could be removed, the property could also be >>> > split up in two, one for each axis. So we'd have >>> > 'scroll-snap-type-block' and 'scroll-snap-type-inline'. >>> >>> I'd love to know what we could improve in >>> <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#snap-dimensions> to make >>> this clearer. They can't be merged, as they do two rather different >>> things. >> >> Examples explaining the differences would help. >> For the description and the examples given for 2D snap positions I'd >> imagine having two 1D snap positions for each axis to work the same. >> >> After rereading the spec. I guess what is actually meant is 'axis >> snapping' vs. 'point snapping'. The difference would be that for axis >> snapping the scroll snapping can happen along the whole *axis*, while >> for point snapping it can only happen at that specific *point*. If >> that's the case, I suggest to rename 1D snap positions and 2D snap >> positions accordingly to clarify that difference. > > As far as I can tell, that's what we wrote in the linked section? The > note in the 1D section is pretty explicit about the difference between > 2D and double-1D: double-1D can horizontally snap to one element, but > vertically snap to a different element entirely, while 2d snapping > always snap both axises to a single element. At least for me it is not clear enough. At least mentioning the word 'point' within the 2D snap position section could clarify things a bit more. Also, as mentioned before, code samples and/or drawings showing the differences would make it more obvious. Sebastian
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2015 07:45:38 UTC