I've often thought it would be nice if there was a meta selector for "detached" so that each author didn't have to create their own custom property. If there were such a meta selector then the existing transition syntax for CSS would be sufficient to create entry and exit transitions as elements were attached and detached. Cheers, - Kris On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Rachel Nabors <rachelnabors@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I see the need. I would argue that this would be more of an > "exit-transition" than exit-animation, though: fires once and describes how > values should change (upon application and in accordance with :detached) > > Right, but the "enter animation" is also basically an enter > transition. The CSS animation syntax is explicitly intended for > animations that play continuously while the element is in some state; > it just so happens that it's fairly easy to tweak things so that an > animation plays only once and then goes quiet, simulating something > that happens on "entrance" to the state. > > If we feel like it's important to do this without JS, then we need to > do it *properly*, not just layer further hacks over the already-abused > Animation syntax. I put together a proposal for that a few years ago, > documented at <http://www.xanthir.com/b4LH0>. In short, you'd use > some custom property to track your "state", then use a rule like: > > @transition selector > for.the-element { > over: --foo; > from: the-state; > to: *; > animation: foo-animation 1s; > } > > And now, anytime the --foo property changes from "--foo: the-state;" > to anything else, it'll fire the animation. > > ~TJ > >Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2015 03:01:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:58 UTC