- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 18:04:39 -0800
- To: "Connor H." <ckh4.ti@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Connor H. <ckh4.ti@gmail.com> wrote: > In section 9.1 scripting Issue 8 asks: > >> Is there a use-case for distinguishing between "UA doesn’t support >> scripting" and "scripting is supported, but turned off"? > > > My thought is that a customised message if a website requires javascript > based on whether their browser is too old to support scripts so that it can > link to a page with browser downloads or it can link to a page showing the > user how to enable scripts. > > Here is the example that I would think of: > http://codepen.io/CKH4/full/mVdVGV/ > > Would this be a good enough cause for adding the separate value? You're talking about browsers that are, like, 20 years old or more. To a good approximation, those browsers no longer exist, and if they did, they wouldn't support these media queries. ^_^ (Or MQs in general - I don't know browser history well enough to know if they support media types and such.) This is also generally what <noscript> is for, no need to invoke CSS. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2015 02:05:31 UTC