The specification reads: ``Repeatedly consume the next input code point from the stream:'' And whenever the code point does not match the two clauses mentioned below, ``anything else Return result.'' I believe that this description wrong. The current code point should be reconsumed, before returning the result, and preventing that a non-matching symbol from the input stream is eaten by the algorithm. A counter-example: #ident{ } would then first consume the "#", which triggers the `Consume a name'-algorithm. It then continues with the `name code point'-path, all the way up to "{". Here it returns result, while "{" is still consumed. If I may suggest a better wording, it would be: ``anything else Reconsume the current input code point and return result.'' See: http://www.w3.org/TR/css-syntax-3/#reconsume-the-current-input-code-point http://www.w3.org/TR/css-syntax-3/#consume-a-nameReceived on Monday, 7 December 2015 13:04:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:58 UTC