- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:27:59 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:14 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Friday 2015-12-04 16:07 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Why do you think that abspos-CB generators don't need to be handled? > > Because the only abspos-CB generated that's not also a fixpos-CB > generator is (I think) 'position', and I don't think there's much of > a use case for 'will-change: position'. > > (Does anyone really want to rapidly toggle between absolute and > relative positioning at 60 Hertz?) Well, between absolute and static. Relpos makes a CB. ^_^ Point isn't necessarily to make it possible to toggle rapidly (tho that's part of it), it's to minimize unrelated visual jumps by making the states more similar in their wide-ranging behavior. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 5 December 2015 00:28:48 UTC