W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [css-align] Two editorial nits

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:13:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDC3cL_Z-FEs8S+LFPSQJUVOD6tX1o1Y5hTbMsLc=jS3Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com> wrote:
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#propdef-align-content
> defines both justify-content/align-content, but the intro
> below the syntax block:
> "Aligns the contents of the box as a whole along the box's
> inline/row/main axis." only applies to justify-content.
> Each container type then has "The 'align-content' property
> applies..." later in the text so it reasonably clear that
> the intro is for justify-content but it's a bit confusing
> at first.
> Consider qualifying the intro like so:
> "'justify-content' aligns the contents ... axis.
> For 'align-content', see below."

I just removed that final phrase, so it no longer talks about axis in
the intro at all.

> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#propdef-justify-items
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#propdef-justify-self
> The value syntax has different order of <overflow-position> /
> <self-position>.  It would be easier to compare the syntax of
> these properties if they used the same order for these terms.
> (ditto for align-items/self)


Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 00:14:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:58 UTC