- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:38:42 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:35 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Wrt optimization, I think you can optimistically assume that most > cases won't be controlled by the min-size, and only do extra work > if that isn't so. In particular, the *normal* path for work here is (1) lay out according to width/height, (2) calculate the min-content width/height and check whether or not you need to make a width/height adjustment to bring it into conformance. Assuming you either (a) don't use percentages in the children, or (b) don't violate the min-width/height constraint, no additional work is done. It's only when you have a % child *and* violate min-width/height that you have do to a second layout pass, because the % children will change size. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 21:39:30 UTC