W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] incorrectly-linkified "flex basis" in spec (wants to be "flex-basis", which will probably fix linkification)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:15:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA+2Pp-6qSNzCaKC+b_hL_7FfhS02jTVFVAqM9bu43eVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Easy flexbox spec typo-fix, I think:
>
> The "flex-basis" property definition's section on <‘width’> has 2
> mentions of "flex basis" (un-hyphenated), followed by 2 mentions of
> "flex-basis" (hyphenated).
>
> I think all of these instances are referring to the "flex-basis"
> property, so they should all be hyphenated and link to the
> property-definition.  (The unhyphenated ones currently link to a
> completely different chunk of the spec, which explains the concept of a
> flex basis.)
>
> Spec quote:
>   # auto
>   #  When specified on a flex item, the auto keyword
>   #  retrieves the value of the main size property as
>   #  the used flex basis.
> (Needs hyphen)----^
>
>   # <‘width’>
>   #  For all other values, flex basis is resolved
> (Needs hyphen)-----------------^
>   #  the same way as width in horizontal writing
>   #  modes [CSS21]: percentage values of flex-basis
>   #  are resolved [...] Similarly, flex-basis [...]
>
> Link:
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/#propdef-flex-basis

Fixed, thanks.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 00:16:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC