- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:49:28 +0200
- To: Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> wrote: >> There is a proposal to drop min/max-prefixes and rely on media queries instead. > As I'm unaware of that, I don't understand how this would solve the > issue though. Sorry. No, it doesn't solve anything, my two points were about why we have to handle the circularity one way or another, so why not handle @viewport inside @media the same way we handle @viewport inside style/link with media attribute. >> That was discussed, but the argument against was that we would still need to handle the media query case for the media attribute > This regards how style is applied, I guess. Couldn't it be solved the same way? > What is the difference *for the rendering engine* between > /* CSS */ @media ... > <link rel="stylesheet" media="..." /> > <style media="..."></style> > ? <link> and <style> are the same, I just happened to show <style> as an example. My point is that we need to handle @viewport depending on viewport-relative media queries either way. Dropping @viewport inside stylesheets based on the owner element's media attribute would be weird. -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 13:49:58 UTC