- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:13:47 +0200
- To: Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Andrea Rendine
<master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The current behavior leads to The Right Thing (tm) in situations where the author isn't contradicting himself, and give predictable (if somewhat counter intuitive) results when he does. I think we should keep it this way.
> Florian, I agree that the presented case is quite messy on the side of
> the author's mind, but then, why not simply stating "@viewport in
> media blocks are not considered at all"? This would be easier to
> understand IMHO.
1. That was discussed, but the argument against was that we would
still need to handle the media query case for the media attribute:
<style media="(min-width: 500px)">@viewport { width: 400px }</style>
2. There is a proposal to drop min/max-prefixes and rely on media
queries instead. So instead of:
@viewport { min-width: 400px }
write:
@viewport { width: 400px }
@media (min-width: 400px) {
@viewport { width: auto }
}
--
Rune Lillesveen
Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 11:14:15 UTC