W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] abspos & align-self: stretch

From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:38:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPTJ0XGSE8aXfTawbkF_nLKHvmq-xVye3em7SE=C8tFj=75qFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you're implementing the Alignment properties for abspos at all,
> yeah, you should do it properly.  It's perfectly okay at the moment to
> implement them for only *some* layout types; we'd prefer they get
> properly implemented for everything, but that's a good bit of work.
> If you don't want to do Alignment for abspos *at all* yet, that's
> fine, but you shouldn't do a partial implementation of abspos
> alignment.

OK, am I understanding you right that a conforming flexbox
implementation can ignore the second and third paragraph of
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#abspos-items?

-christian
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 23:38:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC