- From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:38:08 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > If you're implementing the Alignment properties for abspos at all, > yeah, you should do it properly. It's perfectly okay at the moment to > implement them for only *some* layout types; we'd prefer they get > properly implemented for everything, but that's a good bit of work. > If you don't want to do Alignment for abspos *at all* yet, that's > fine, but you shouldn't do a partial implementation of abspos > alignment. OK, am I understanding you right that a conforming flexbox implementation can ignore the second and third paragraph of http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#abspos-items? -christian
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 23:38:35 UTC