On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:47:30 +0200, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:14:27 +0200, Robert O'Callahan < >> robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: >> >> In most ways, the root element acts as the viewport element. So I think >>> scrollingElement would make more sense here. >>> >> >> OK. I'm fine with either name. Anyone else have opinions about the name? >> If not I'll change to scrollingElement. >> > > I prefer scrollingElement as well (could use 'viewportScrollingElement' > to > be pedantic, but that seems overly long). Thanks! OK, changed. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9550767396214e0710ef77abe74b2715cc5cc3f2 > Do you think the spec text for scrollTop/Left/Width/Height could now be > simplified by referring to the scrollingElement (rather than repeating > the > rules for each API)? That's probably how I'll implement it in blink. Yeah... filed https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28450 cheers -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Thursday, 9 April 2015 13:01:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:50 UTC