W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2015

Re: [cssom-view] Easing the transition to spec-compatible body scrollTop behavior

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 15:01:02 +0200
To: "Rick Byers" <rbyers@chromium.org>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xwts30t8idj3kv@simons-mbp>
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:47:30 +0200, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:14:27 +0200, Robert O'Callahan <
>> robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
>>
>>  In most ways, the root element acts as the viewport element. So I think
>>> scrollingElement would make more sense here.
>>>
>>
>> OK. I'm fine with either name. Anyone else have opinions about the name?
>> If not I'll change to scrollingElement.
>>
>
> I prefer scrollingElement as well (could use 'viewportScrollingElement'  
> to
> be pedantic, but that seems overly long).  Thanks!

OK, changed.

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9550767396214e0710ef77abe74b2715cc5cc3f2

> Do you think the spec text for scrollTop/Left/Width/Height could now be
> simplified by referring to the scrollingElement (rather than repeating  
> the
> rules for each API)?  That's probably how I'll implement it in blink.

Yeah... filed https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28450

cheers
-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 13:01:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC