Re: [css-animations] Proposal for handling changes to animation-* properties while an animation is running from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2014-09-23 (www-style@w3.org from September 2014)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:46:55 -0700
To: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Cc: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAhnr6_NPy4F++wZSOFPSwLikZmafW6BVtODy7XE4LKGg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> Yes, this is worth investigation. I'd like to see us explicitly call out that UAs are not required to dispatch more than one iteration event per frame for cases like:
>>
>>  animation: yer 0.001s 1000
>>
>> In fact, for the above, I'd like if UAs weren't required to dispatch an iteration event at all if no frame fell within the animation's interval.
>
> Sounds reasonable. (Though I do not believe we really define what a frame is)

We can explicitly ref whatever requestAnimationFrame talks about.  I
just pinged Hixie for the correct term, since he's taking over the rAF
text.

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 22:47:41 UTC