W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2014

Re: [css-images] Updating Images 3

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:42:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA3Fmhfe4QQuU88Crv2rGvK+REG69T9EnZkbq-1-Wrukw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 09/23/2014 01:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> No, the Level 3 text has been unmaintained for two years, and I'm not
>> willing to republish it as-is.  Significant tweaks, corrections, and
>> improvements have gone into L4 in the two years since I last published
>> L3.
>
> That's great, but then each individual change needs review.

Correct.  That's what I'm asking for help with.

(This is what happens when one doesn't republish for two years while
development is still more-or-less continually ongoing; lots of changes
pile up!)

>>> If you want to publish L4 with new stuff, then let's go do that. We
>>> don't need to disturb L3. It should only get features removed, not
>>> added.
>>
>>
>> No, that's not what we discussed when we first talked about "publish
>> two levels at the same time".
>>
>> If you want me to not add anything to L3, then we need to write tests
>> sufficient to get L3 out of CR, so L4 can take its place.  Until that
>> happens, L3 is where stable things go, L4 is for tracking experimental
>> things.
>
> I'm pretty sure that's not what we discussed, but you can take it up
> with the WG, I don't feel like arguing this point.

Yup, I added it to the agenda already.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 22:43:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:46 UTC