- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:45:55 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/15/2014 09:30 PM, John Daggett wrote: > > fantasai wrote: > >>> I continue to think that the behavior of 'sideways' is unnecessary >>> here and the fact that you have three property values here will >>> cause author confusion. But the table cell case you and GĂ©rard have >>> pointed out makes sense so I'll relent here. >> >> 'sideways' is automatic so that horizontal-script authors don't >> have to think about which direction they rotated the block. >> You just set >> 'text-orientation: sideways' >> on the root element and forget about it. > > Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "which direction they > rotated the block". Are you talking about which writing mode they > set on a given table header (i.e. vertical-rl vs. vertical-lr)? Yes. (From an English-language perspective, there isn't "vertical writing", there's just rotated text...) ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 15:46:30 UTC