- From: Benjamin Poulain <bpoulain@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:19:50 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, Currently, :nth-child() does not restrict pseudo-elements like :not() does. Shouldn’t it have the same restrictions? For example: :nth-child(2n of ::after) :nth-child(2n+1 of ::first-letter) do not make much sense. Benjamin
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 03:22:10 UTC