Hi, Currently, :nth-child() does not restrict pseudo-elements like :not() does. Shouldn’t it have the same restrictions? For example: :nth-child(2n of ::after) :nth-child(2n+1 of ::first-letter) do not make much sense. BenjaminReceived on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 03:22:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:46 UTC