On Sep 3, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Benjamin Poulain <bpoulain@apple.com> wrote: >> For some reason I believed combinators were not allowed inside pseudo class. >> It looks like there is no such restriction in the definition. The various pseudo classes accepting selectors take “selector list” as an argument. Selector list is defined including “complex selectors”. >> >> For example, the new nth-child with a selector list could be: >> :nth-child(2n of a>b+c, d>e>f) >> >> Is that the case? Am I missing something? > > You're correct, that is allowed. Unless they specify a compound > selector list; "selector list" by itself refers to a list of complex > selectors, which allow combinators. Thanks for clarifying this. BenjaminReceived on Thursday, 4 September 2014 02:53:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:41 UTC