[css3-transforms] 3D transform updates

Thanks for doing this! The spec is much improved.

Putting all non-3D content of a 3D rendering context at the very bottom of
z-order seems simpler and more robust than putting it at z=0 as the spec
currently says. Authors can usually opt into the z=0 effect by wrapping
content in a trivial 3D transform. There is one case where they can't: as
written, a preserve-3d child of the root element can be partially behind
and partially in front of a 'position:fixed' element. Is that something we
want to support --- or something we explicitly *don't* want to support?

Do we know anything about how Web-compatible the spec changes are?

oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.

Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 22:36:36 UTC