- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:52:15 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/22/14, 7:21 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: >On Wednesday 2014-10-22 00:42 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> There is a fair point here though; when we say 'middle' we're talking >>about the middle of the timing function curve, which may not be the >>middle of the corresponding time interval. So if you know when you want >>a discrete property to change value, figuring out the before/after >>keyframe selector value is not user-friendly in non-linear cases. > >It should be relatively easy with the step-start or step-end timing >functions, which I think are what we should recommend for discrete >animations. The "change at middle of timing function behavior" is >really just to make everything else defined while also producing the >results we want for step-start and step-end. Ah, yes, good point. You can animate discrete values using steps separately from those things that interpolate and combine the two.
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2014 20:52:47 UTC