[css-text] Clarification request on text-justify poll

I’m thinking about the author poll for text-justify the WG resolved in the last F2F, and I’d appreciate a bit more clarifications. Sorry if it was already talked at the F2F, the voices wasn’t always clear.

Q1: By looking at the Future Possibilities[1] and Regressions[2] table, I think it’s obvious that Chinese and Japanese would prefer “Expand CJ not K", so when we say we want to poll to authors, are we talking about Korean authors?

Q2: Within the 3 options, should we include all 3 options including “Solid CJK”, or just “Expand CJ not K” and “Compromise”?

Q3: I’d like to understand what the WG would like to do against the poll results. I guess that the WG is happy to take “Expand CJ not K” if Korean authors prefer that too. What would happen if not (i.e., preferred different options than C/J, split, or not enough responses, etc.)?

[1] http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/text-justify-auto#future-possibilities
[2] http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/text-justify-auto#regressions


Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 03:24:14 UTC