- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:18:10 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAERejNbo4MxKjW4zCTGMM5Dp8-K5jnZJHKDLoh1COF07b8tvxA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12 October 2014 09:03, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:09 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> > wrote: > >>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:05:18 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. < > jackalmage@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > > ... > >>>> > >>>> Anyone have objections to us just aliasing the value as "no-wrap"? > >>>> That way, in a few years, people can just do the logical thing and use > >>>> the value they expect, rather than having to deal with this wart > >>>> forever. > >>> > >>> > >>> I don't particularly like that idea. I think in general old syntax > should be > >>> left alone. Adding aliases is not zero cost. > >>> > >>> But if this one thing is a major pain point for authors, then maybe > it's > >>> worth it. Is it? > >> > >> I forget it almost every time I use the the stupid value, and I hear > >> grumblings about it relatively constantly. It's also the *very first* > >> mistake on <https://wiki.csswg.org/ideas/mistakes>. > > > > If we do that, can we also alias 'border-radius' into 'corner-radius'? I > know this confuses many people into thinking it is only for when you have > visible borders, when really it's affect is just as dramatic on a filled-in > background with no borders. It looks like it belongs with the other > 'border-*' properties that are components of the 'border' shorthand, but it > doesn't (it isn't). > > We've got a lot of confusing names, but I think "nowrap" is extra > special here, particularly since it's in a property which is already > difficult to tell whether it's one or two words. "border-radius" is > less than great, but I dunno if it's worth enough to change the name. > > (And I don't want to get this topic derailed with slippery slope fears!) > At least you should rename 'border-corner' to 'corner-radius' in the wiki page you linked to. Sebastian
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2014 19:18:58 UTC