- From: Matt Rakow <marakow@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:53:46 +0000
- To: Jet Villegas W3C <w3c@junglecode.net>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Sorry I missed this, didn’t hit my email rules. I'm glad to hear Mozilla is still interested in shipping snap-points -- after the declaration from Google that they aren't interested in the properties I've certainly focused less on this area. If Mozilla is still interested I'm happy to pick this back up as an active project. Thanks, -Matt ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jet Villegas W3C [mailto:w3c@junglecode.net] Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 11:31 AM To: Robert O'Callahan Cc: www-style Subject: Re: CSS snappoints update The Mozilla bug for this feature: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=945584 As Rob noted, our implementation work has advanced to the point that we'd like to clarify the normative descriptions prior to shipping in Firefox. --Jet On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: People at Mozilla would like to make some progress on a spec, because we'd like to ship something. A couple of things have changed since the last go-around: 1) It's become clear that the previous model we had where snap-points depended, in part, on the direction of a scroll gesture, was a mistake. So that brings us closer to consensus. 2) Some use-cases which some people wanted CSS snappoints to solve (e.g. scripted smooth scrolling by a whole page) can now be satisfactorily solved using CSSOM APIs, e.g. element.scrollBy({ left:..., behavior:"smooth"). I still think a case has not been made for scroll-snap-points-x/y to support any value other than "elements", so we should get rid of it. I think scroll-snap-coordinate should allow specifying the type of box used (margin or border-box, at least) as well as an offset from the edge of that box. I still think that scroll-snap-coordinate and scroll-snap-destination are terrible names. I'm worried that there are loads of outstanding issues noted in the draft but there have been no edits since March :-(. Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro ooofo otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 15:54:15 UTC