Re: [shadow-styling] Scoping at-rules like @font-face in scoped styled and shadow trees?

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Mathias Bynens <> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Cameron McCormack <> wrote:
>>> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>>> For style=""
>>>>> attributes on elements within a style scope, you are right that you won't
>>>>> know what your scope element is (although in Gecko we do know that the
>>>>> element is in a style scope) and will have to traverse up to find it.
>>>> While we're talking about style='', this seems fragile.  If this
>>>> allows arbitrary descendants to opt in, then it means that you can
>>>> accidentally co-opt it by inserting *another* scoped stylesheet
>>>> between the intended stylesheet and the element reffing the name.
>>> Sure, but then that's the same as co-opting uses of scoped() in a <style
>>> scoped> sheet if you insert another <style scoped> somewhere up the tree,
>>> isn't it?
>> Yes, but that's hopefully more intentional, and definitely less common
>> than just adding an unrelated <style scoped>.
>> Anyway, Cam and I talked this out in IRC, and agreed that Shadow DOM
>> at least should be able to work fine with "scoping to the shadow
>> root", and we can solve the more general problem of scoped stylesheets
>> later.
> Apparently this is still an issue:
> What
> happened after this thread? Any bugs we can track?

The bug to track is the thing you just linked, isn't it?


Received on Friday, 3 October 2014 16:22:04 UTC