- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:51:13 +0200
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Alan Stearns: > >> body { baseline-grid: new } > >> img, figure, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, nav, etc. { baseline-grid: none } > >> > >> And the opt-in version would be: > >> > >> body { line-grid: create } > >> p { line-snap: baseline } > > >I guess this was intended to show, that opt-in would be less complex for > >authors, but there are of course more body text elements that usually > >should “aline” with ‘p’, e.g.: > > > > p, dt, dd, li, blockquote, pre, … {line-snap: baseline;} > > Yes, that’s correct. Perhaps you’d add a class to the elements that should > snap their lines (this would work for opt-out as well). I’m still in favor > of opt-in, given Dave’s evaluation that there would be fewer elements > using the grid than not. Do you want to argue for the opt-out scheme with > a single property? The one-property solution described in CSS Books gives you both opt-in and opt-out so there's not much reason to argue. Opt-in: p, dt, dd, li, blockquote, pre { baseline-snap: root } Opt-out: body { baseline-snap: new } h1, h2, img, figure { baseline-snap: clear } -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2014 19:34:18 UTC