- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:51:13 +0200
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Alan Stearns:
> >> body { baseline-grid: new }
> >> img, figure, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, nav, etc. { baseline-grid: none }
> >>
> >> And the opt-in version would be:
> >>
> >> body { line-grid: create }
> >> p { line-snap: baseline }
>
> >I guess this was intended to show, that opt-in would be less complex for
> >authors, but there are of course more body text elements that usually
> >should “aline” with ‘p’, e.g.:
> >
> > p, dt, dd, li, blockquote, pre, … {line-snap: baseline;}
>
> Yes, that’s correct. Perhaps you’d add a class to the elements that should
> snap their lines (this would work for opt-out as well). I’m still in favor
> of opt-in, given Dave’s evaluation that there would be fewer elements
> using the grid than not. Do you want to argue for the opt-out scheme with
> a single property?
The one-property solution described in CSS Books gives you both opt-in
and opt-out so there's not much reason to argue.
Opt-in:
p, dt, dd, li, blockquote, pre { baseline-snap: root }
Opt-out:
body { baseline-snap: new }
h1, h2, img, figure { baseline-snap: clear }
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2014 19:34:18 UTC