> > If I understood what you’re doing correctly, I believe that if we changed > to what is suggested in that issue instead of the current text, your > scenario would work out fine. > Yes, we would very much prefer Bert Bos' phrasing to be used here, so that our scenario becomes possible. To elaborate a little bit more about what we're trying to do, precisely: 1) the user is allowed to specify whether she wants to print the page (containing a presentation) in either Portrait or Landscape mode; 2) if she chose Portrait, the page size is somewhat irrelevant to us (crazy uncommon sizes notwithstanding), because we specify a layout of slides with the narrative that fits to a generic A4/US Letter type page; 3) if she chose Landscape, the page size is deliberately adjusted on our end to precisely match the 8:5 (W:H) aspect ratio of our slides, so that the pages that are created are a perfect fit for the slides. This means little in actual printed version where page size may not play a role anyway since you likely only have the one size available, but it matters a LOT in the "Print to PDF" experience where each page size becomes the actual specified dimensions of each page in the output PDF. I hope that helps explain things in very concrete and clear terms. Thanks, FarukReceived on Thursday, 27 November 2014 15:48:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:46 UTC