- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:44:52 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Beam <dbeam@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > :empty either *always* matches ::before pseudos, or isn't applicable > to them at all (depending on some unstated additional requirements in > the spec that really need to be written down*). It's not actually > useful for anything. ::before doesn't exist unless it has content, so your second statement seems more true. Except that an empty string as content does bring it into existence, and that should match :empty, I would think. But not generally useful. Once you insert an image into it, it is not empty, even if the image hasn't loaded.
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 14:45:27 UTC