- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:39:02 -0800
- To: Shinyu Murakami <murakami@vivliostyle.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:57 PM, Shinyu Murakami <murakami@vivliostyle.com> wrote: > > AntennaHouse, I worked for, implemented A and B as that was defined > in GCPM3 draft. Both A and B are useful for many cases, but not perfect. > > I think the GCPM4 proposal using CSS Regions is teh best, because it > can use same mechanism and syntax with CSS Regions that is already > implemented in browsers (or there are polyfills) and this regions > mechanism is neccessary for making CSS powerful enough for layout > complex pages. It's good to hear. There are similarities between that one and what I proposed. One advantage of mine is that you can use the flow as part of the 'content' property (instead of using it in a region chain). This gives you the best of named strings and running headers together in one region-flow-based mechanism.
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 06:39:31 UTC