W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2014

Re: [css-gcpm] String-set issues

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:39:02 -0800
Message-Id: <1792B563-62EC-4175-BE59-60D725B70060@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: Shinyu Murakami <murakami@vivliostyle.com>

> On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:57 PM, Shinyu Murakami <murakami@vivliostyle.com> wrote:
> AntennaHouse, I worked for, implemented A and B as that was defined 
> in GCPM3 draft. Both A and B are useful for many cases, but not perfect.
> I think the GCPM4 proposal using CSS Regions is teh best, because it 
> can use same mechanism and syntax with CSS Regions that is already
> implemented in browsers (or there are polyfills) and this regions
> mechanism is neccessary for making CSS powerful enough for layout 
> complex pages.

It's good to hear. There are similarities between that one and what I proposed. One advantage of mine is that you can use the flow as part of the 'content' property (instead of using it in a region chain). This gives you the best of named strings and running headers together in one region-flow-based mechanism. 
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 06:39:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:48 UTC