Apologies for not knowing the full background of this decision, but could someone point me at documentation for why it's bad for position:fixed to be a stacking context? There are definitely performance & simplicity advantages to Blink making it so. Chris (Blink engineer) On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com> wrote: > > I'm pretty sure this is an example of Webkit/Blink incorrectly (but > intentionally) treating position:fixed as inducing a stacking context. See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0000.html and > related discussions. > > >Rob > > Thanks for the context. Does anyone know if Blink/Webkit has addressed > their architectural issues so that they no longer need to promote fixed > elements to a stacking context to get mobile perf (I understand this has > been a focus at Blink this year)? > > Thanks, > Greg >Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 23:16:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:45 UTC