- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:04:41 -0500
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, kawabata taichi <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/11/2014 05:52 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > > Yes, we have that in W3C HTML5, but we don't have it in WHATWG HTML5. > I think the behavior defined in W3C HTML5 is just a simplified version > of that in Ruby Anotation spec for XHTML http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/ . > Given the use cases proposed in XHTML spec, I think nested ruby is even > better in semantics for many of them. No, Xidorn, it is not. WHATWG Ruby and HTML5 Ruby Ruby are significantly different in how they handle <ruby><rb/><rt/><rt/></ruby>, and the CSS spec is intentionally designed to handle the HTML5 Ruby model (because I don't agree with the WHATWG model). ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 01:05:14 UTC