- From: kawabata taichi <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:20:13 +0900
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 22:20:42 UTC
Dear David, On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 3:42 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ruby/#base-annotation-pairing says: > # If there are not enough ruby annotations in a ruby annotation > # container, the last one is paired with (spans across) any excess > # ruby bases. (If there are not any in the ruby annotation > # container, an anonymous empty one is assumed to exist.) > > Is there actually a use case for this behavior, or is it really just > defining error handling? > As far as I know, this is an intended behaviour based on existing use case. JLREQ usage (Fig. 3.61) usage is certainly rare, but it does have non- ignorable presence in various occasions. Also, it copes with HTML5 Ruby behaviour. cf. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#annotation-pairing - When ruby-base elements excesses, all of them matched into last of existing ruby base. - When ruby-text elements excesses, it matches to virtual empty ruby texts, Regards, -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- KAWABATA, Taichi E-mail: kawabata.taichi@gmail.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 22:20:42 UTC