- From: Karen Menezes <karen.menezes@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:13:03 +0530
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 15:43:30 UTC
Thanks Alan... I had come across this, but was unsure because they didn't mention vertical inside vertical and horizontal inside horizontal :p On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > On 11/10/14, 11:10 PM, "Karen Menezes" <karen.menezes@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I have a question regarding (immediate) children of a parent with > >display: flex, i.e. a flex container. Can a child or flex-item also have > >a display of flex associated with it, thereby becoming a flex-container > >itself? > >I was unable to find the answer here: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/ > >What is the spec's take on this? > > The abstract mentions that nesting flex boxes is an expected use: > > "Nesting of these boxes (horizontal inside vertical, or vertical inside > horizontal) can be used to build layouts in two dimensions.” > > > Thanks, > > Alan > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 15:43:30 UTC