W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2014

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:34:04 -0500
Message-ID: <545D109C.8040908@gmail.com>
To: chaals@yandex-team.ru, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/7/14 12:57 PM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> 07.11.2014, 17:53, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>:
>> On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>>   On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>>   On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>   [Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html
>>>>   It would be nice if editor's draft points to https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/
>>>   That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or not.
>>>   Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests?
>> I'm pretty sure there is no rule against pointing to another spec in a Note.
>>>   I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate.
>> It probably makes sense to do that anyway. They should both point to the
>> currently-maintained draft.
> Yeah, the point is that we are not maintaining a draft and WHAT-WG are.

OK, so I just checked in a patch that sets the Latest Editor's Draft 
points to Anne's document 
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 18:34:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:45 UTC