Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

On 11/7/14 12:57 PM, wrote:
> 07.11.2014, 17:53, "fantasai" <>:
>> On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>>   On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>>   On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <> wrote:
>>>>>   [Draft-Note]
>>>>   It would be nice if editor's draft points to
>>>   That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or not.
>>>   Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests?
>> I'm pretty sure there is no rule against pointing to another spec in a Note.
>>>   I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate.
>> It probably makes sense to do that anyway. They should both point to the
>> currently-maintained draft.
> Yeah, the point is that we are not maintaining a draft and WHAT-WG are.

OK, so I just checked in a patch that sets the Latest Editor's Draft 
points to Anne's document 

Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 18:34:32 UTC