Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <> wrote:
>>> [Draft-Note]
>> It would be nice if editor's draft points to
> That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or not.
> Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests?

I'm pretty sure there is no rule against pointing to another spec in a Note.

> I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate.

It probably makes sense to do that anyway. They should both point to the
currently-maintained draft.


Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 16:52:05 UTC