- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:51:30 -0500
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: >>> [Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html >> It would be nice if editor's draft points to https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/ > > That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or not. > Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests? I'm pretty sure there is no rule against pointing to another spec in a Note. > I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate. It probably makes sense to do that anyway. They should both point to the currently-maintained draft. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 16:52:05 UTC